chore: work item count api response#52
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 45 minutes and 20 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough
ChangesGrouped Work Item Count Schema
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
This pull request standardizes the API response format for work item group counts by always using the key
count(instead of sometimes usingtotal_count) in both flat and nested groupings. This change ensures consistency in the response structure and updates related documentation, type definitions, and print statements accordingly.API response and model consistency:
WorkItemGroupCountEntrymodel now always uses thecountfield for group counts, removing the previously usedtotal_countfield. This applies to both flat (single group) and nested (group + sub-group) responses.plane/api/work_items/base.pyandplane/models/work_items.pyhave been updated to reflect the consistent use ofcountin all cases. [1] [2]countinstead oftotal_countfor both top-level and nested group counts.count_workspacenow referenceentry.countinstead ofentry.total_countto match the updated model.Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
Bug Fixes
Documentation